[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171002092952.GC8637@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 11:29:52 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ratelimit: use deferred printk() version
On Fri 2017-09-29 13:55:46, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (Cc-ing Andrew lkml.kernel.org/r/20170928120405.18273-1-sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com )
>
> On (09/28/17 21:13), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > (Cc-ing Sasha)
> >
> > On (09/28/17 21:04), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > [..]
> > > : process 9121 (trinity-c78) no longer affine to cpu8
> > > : smpboot: CPU 8 is now offline
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6b1d174b0c27b ("ratelimit: extend to print suppressed messages on release")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> > > Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
The change looks reasonable to me. Thanks a lot for digging into the
reported problem. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> a quick question, who is going to pick it up? or shall we ask Andrew?
I see that Andrew already took it. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists