[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171002113510.00002392@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 11:35:10 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Harinath Nampally <harinath922@...il.com>, <knaack.h@....de>,
<lars@...afoo.de>, <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <amsfield22@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: accel: mma8452: Rename structs holding
event configuration registers to more appropriate names.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:10:49 +0200
Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de> wrote:
> On 2017-09-30 19:59, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:52:54 +0200
> > Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 25.09.2017 12:40 schrieb Harinath Nampally:
> >>> Improves code readability, no impact on functionality.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Harinath Nampally <harinath922@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> I'd prefer a shorter subject line here too, see patch 2/3
> >
> > Agreed. I'm unconvinced the change helps. Perhaps that is
> > because I don't fully understand why you are making the change?
> >
>
> It's understandable for me. It simply uses "transient" and "ff_mt" in
> order to describe sets of device-registers instead of "rising" and
> "falling". That's more appropriate. I'd apply this if possible.
>
> Even though it should be clear after reading the data sheet, this
> particular issue sometimes gets confusing for people. Maybe a short
> descriptive comment, pointing to the data sheet, would make sense?
>
With the addition of some description, this should be fine.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> martin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists