[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171002114322.GA8908@manoharreddy>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:13:22 +0530
From: Keerthi Reddy <keerthigd4990@...il.com>
To: outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: use usleep_range instead of udelay
Since a its a slow device, allow a small range of 100
Signed-off-by: Keerthi Reddy <Keerthigd4990@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c
index a6b7bff..418e29d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ int switch_normal_clock(struct rtsx_chip *chip, int clk)
}
if (sd_vpclk_phase_reset) {
- udelay(200);
+ usleep_range(200, 300);
retval = rtsx_write_register(chip, SD_VPCLK0_CTL,
PHASE_NOT_RESET, PHASE_NOT_RESET);
if (retval) {
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ int switch_normal_clock(struct rtsx_chip *chip, int clk)
rtsx_trace(chip);
return retval;
}
- udelay(200);
+ usleep_range(200, 300);
}
retval = rtsx_write_register(chip, CLK_CTL, 0xFF, 0);
if (retval) {
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists