[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1506960093.3368.21.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:01:34 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"martin@...htvoll.de" <martin@...htvoll.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jthumshirn@...e.de" <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
"oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
"hare@...e.com" <hare@...e.com>,
"cavery@...hat.com" <cavery@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/6] block: tracking request allocation with
q_usage_counter
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 14:12 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> @@ -1395,16 +1401,21 @@ static struct request *blk_old_get_request(struct request_queue *q,
> unsigned int op, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> struct request *rq;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(q->mq_ops);
>
> /* create ioc upfront */
> create_io_context(gfp_mask, q->node);
>
> + ret = blk_queue_enter(q, !(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM));
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
Can the above blk_queue_enter() call block if the REQ_NOWAIT flag has been
set in the op argument and e.g. gfp_mask == GFP_KERNEL? If so, isn't that a
bug?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists