[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeU0aPZ8BGSyrQeua=tUfme38frM-GxtmHrirveS0XdcnzWww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:20:37 -0700
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: remove unused parameter from balance_dirty_pages()
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited doesn't really need mapping as well. All
> it needs is the inode and we already have it in callers. So would it
> make sense to refactor a bit further and make its argument an inode?
My only concern is that, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() is an
exported function so changing its signature could potentially break
some drivers?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists