[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d599b4d-93e3-3e3e-875a-f24ee879ca74@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 22:40:44 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: s3c64xx: Delete an unnecessary return statement in
samsung_bl_set()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 22:30:55 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Thus remove such a statement in the affected function.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-backlight.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-backlight.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-backlight.c
index 7e2db762c442..7ef8b9019344 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-backlight.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-backlight.c
@@ -141,5 +141,4 @@ void __init samsung_bl_set(struct samsung_bl_gpio_info *gpio_info,
kfree(samsung_bl_data);
err_data:
kfree(samsung_bl_device);
- return;
}
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists