[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1507028295-9353-1-git-send-email-mguzik@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 12:58:13 +0200
From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: mszeredi@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] minor fd cleanup
The first patch is a super minor nit and I'm fine with it being ignored.
Second patch is imho of actual value.
fd_install has an avoidable requirement to be called in a sleepable context.
It matters e.g. in rhel7 to where the patch was recently backported and the
new requirement could not be enforced.
I don't see any benefits from sleeping over locking and not sleeping makes
the function slightly nicer.
Mateusz Guzik (2):
vfs: stop clearing close on exec when closing a fd
vfs: grab the lock instead of blocking in __fd_install during resizing
Documentation/filesystems/porting | 4 ----
fs/file.c | 12 +++++++-----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists