linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 62/64] KVM: VMX: use cmpxchg64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  3 Oct 2017 14:23:54 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 62/64] KVM: VMX: use cmpxchg64

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

commit c0a1666bcb2a33e84187a15eabdcd54056be9a97 upstream.

This fixes a compilation failure on 32-bit systems.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2203,8 +2203,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_pi_load(struct kvm_
 			new.ndst = (dest << 8) & 0xFF00;
 
 		new.sn = 0;
-	} while (cmpxchg(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
-			new.control) != old.control);
+	} while (cmpxchg64(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
+			   new.control) != old.control);
 }
 
 static void decache_tsc_multiplier(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
@@ -11039,8 +11039,8 @@ static void __pi_post_block(struct kvm_v
 
 		/* set 'NV' to 'notification vector' */
 		new.nv = POSTED_INTR_VECTOR;
-	} while (cmpxchg(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
-			new.control) != old.control);
+	} while (cmpxchg64(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
+			   new.control) != old.control);
 
 	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->pre_pcpu == -1)) {
 		spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
@@ -11109,8 +11109,8 @@ static int pi_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu
 
 		/* set 'NV' to 'wakeup vector' */
 		new.nv = POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR;
-	} while (cmpxchg(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
-			new.control) != old.control);
+	} while (cmpxchg64(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
+			   new.control) != old.control);
 
 	/* We should not block the vCPU if an interrupt is posted for it.  */
 	if (pi_test_on(pi_desc) == 1)