[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171003122823.mdzkhxs4xza7sb2w@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:28:23 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
willy@...radead.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
sam@...nborg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
bob.picco@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] sparc64/mm: setting fields in deferred pages
On Wed 20-09-17 16:17:04, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Without deferred struct page feature (CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT),
> flags and other fields in "struct page"es are never changed prior to first
> initializing struct pages by going through __init_single_page().
>
> With deferred struct page feature enabled there is a case where we set some
> fields prior to initializing:
>
> mem_init() {
> register_page_bootmem_info();
> free_all_bootmem();
> ...
> }
>
> When register_page_bootmem_info() is called only non-deferred struct pages
> are initialized. But, this function goes through some reserved pages which
> might be part of the deferred, and thus are not yet initialized.
>
> mem_init
> register_page_bootmem_info
> register_page_bootmem_info_node
> get_page_bootmem
> .. setting fields here ..
> such as: page->freelist = (void *)type;
>
> free_all_bootmem()
> free_low_memory_core_early()
> for_each_reserved_mem_region()
> reserve_bootmem_region()
> init_reserved_page() <- Only if this is deferred reserved page
> __init_single_pfn()
> __init_single_page()
> memset(0) <-- Loose the set fields here
>
> We end-up with similar issue as in the previous patch, where currently we
> do not observe problem as memory is zeroed. But, if flag asserts are
> changed we can start hitting issues.
>
> Also, because in this patch series we will stop zeroing struct page memory
> during allocation, we must make sure that struct pages are properly
> initialized prior to using them.
>
> The deferred-reserved pages are initialized in free_all_bootmem().
> Therefore, the fix is to switch the above calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
As you separated x86 and sparc patches doing essentially the same I
assume David is going to take this patch?
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
> index 6034569e2c0d..310c6754bcaa 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -2548,9 +2548,15 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
> {
> high_memory = __va(last_valid_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> - register_page_bootmem_info();
> free_all_bootmem();
>
> + /* Must be done after boot memory is put on freelist, because here we
> + * might set fields in deferred struct pages that have not yet been
> + * initialized, and free_all_bootmem() initializes all the reserved
> + * deferred pages for us.
> + */
> + register_page_bootmem_info();
> +
> /*
> * Set up the zero page, mark it reserved, so that page count
> * is not manipulated when freeing the page from user ptes.
> --
> 2.14.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists