[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171003124305.GM11879@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:43:05 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, jack@...e.cz, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] writeback: switch wakeup_flusher_threads() to
cyclic writeback
On Wed 27-09-17 14:13:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We're writing back the full range of dirty pages on the devices,
> there's no point in making this special and not do normal range
> cyclic writeback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
OK, since this is just ordinary "memory cleaning" writeback, I agree that
range_cyclic probably makes more sense. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index bb6148dc6d24..65e6992d8719 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(enum wb_reason reason)
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(wb, &bdi->wb_list, bdi_node)
> wb_start_writeback(wb, wb_split_bdi_pages(wb, nr_pages),
> - false, reason);
> + true, reason);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists