linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.13 062/110] libceph: dont allow bidirectional swap of pg-upmap-items

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  3 Oct 2017 14:29:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 062/110] libceph: dont allow bidirectional swap of pg-upmap-items

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>

commit 29a0cfbf91ba997591535a4f7246835ce8328141 upstream.

This reverts most of commit f53b7665c8ce ("libceph: upmap semantic
changes").

We need to prevent duplicates in the final result.  For example, we
can currently take

  [1,2,3] and apply [(1,2)] and get [2,2,3]

or

  [1,2,3] and apply [(3,2)] and get [1,2,2]

The rest of the system is not prepared to handle duplicates in the
result set like this.

The reverted piece was intended to allow

  [1,2,3] and [(1,2),(2,1)] to get [2,1,3]

to reorder primaries.  First, this bidirectional swap is hard to
implement in a way that also prevents dups.  For example, [1,2,3] and
[(1,4),(2,3),(3,4)] would give [4,3,4] but would we just drop the last
step we'd have [4,3,3] which is also invalid, etc.  Simpler to just not
handle bidirectional swaps.  In practice, they are not needed: if you
just want to choose a different primary then use primary_affinity, or
pg_upmap (not pg_upmap_items).

Link: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21410
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/ceph/osdmap.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ceph/osdmap.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osdmap.c
@@ -2445,19 +2445,34 @@ static void apply_upmap(struct ceph_osdm
 
 	pg = lookup_pg_mapping(&osdmap->pg_upmap_items, pgid);
 	if (pg) {
-		for (i = 0; i < raw->size; i++) {
-			for (j = 0; j < pg->pg_upmap_items.len; j++) {
-				int from = pg->pg_upmap_items.from_to[j][0];
-				int to = pg->pg_upmap_items.from_to[j][1];
+		/*
+		 * Note: this approach does not allow a bidirectional swap,
+		 * e.g., [[1,2],[2,1]] applied to [0,1,2] -> [0,2,1].
+		 */
+		for (i = 0; i < pg->pg_upmap_items.len; i++) {
+			int from = pg->pg_upmap_items.from_to[i][0];
+			int to = pg->pg_upmap_items.from_to[i][1];
+			int pos = -1;
+			bool exists = false;
 
-				if (from == raw->osds[i]) {
-					if (!(to != CRUSH_ITEM_NONE &&
-					      to < osdmap->max_osd &&
-					      osdmap->osd_weight[to] == 0))
-						raw->osds[i] = to;
+			/* make sure replacement doesn't already appear */
+			for (j = 0; j < raw->size; j++) {
+				int osd = raw->osds[j];
+
+				if (osd == to) {
+					exists = true;
 					break;
 				}
+				/* ignore mapping if target is marked out */
+				if (osd == from && pos < 0 &&
+				    !(to != CRUSH_ITEM_NONE &&
+				      to < osdmap->max_osd &&
+				      osdmap->osd_weight[to] == 0)) {
+					pos = j;
+				}
 			}
+			if (!exists && pos >= 0)
+				raw->osds[pos] = to;
 		}
 	}
 }