[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+M3ks4i543BDPNoa06ktd3mcBAnKAMEsRTyc275fr2CUzTUJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:55:07 +0200
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Vetter, Daniel" <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi :remove is_panel_bridge
2017-10-03 11:24 GMT+02:00 Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>:
> On 2 October 2017 at 10:34, Benjamin Gaignard
> <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org> wrote:
>> When using drm_of_panel_bridge_remove() we can simplify the
>> code and remove is_panel_bridge from dw_mipi_dsi structure.
>>
> As the previous patches remove the struct drm_bridge pointer, it might
> be worth mentioning why that cannot be done here?
>
> If you agree, please don't resent the patches - just amend before pushing.
Will add that:
Because drm_bridge pointer is used in attach and post_disable functions it can't
be removed from internal driver structure .
>
> Thanks
> Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists