linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: grab the lock instead of blocking in __fd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2017 07:41:11 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, mszeredi@...hat.com,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: grab the lock instead of blocking in
 __fd_install during resizing

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com> wrote:
> Explicit locking in the fallback case provides a safe state of the
> table. Getting rid of blocking semantics makes __fd_install usable
> again in non-sleepable contexts, which easies backporting efforts.
>
> There is a side effect of slightly nicer assembly for the common case
> as might_sleep can now be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/porting |  4 ----
>  fs/file.c                         | 11 +++++++----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Nice change !

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>