[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171003153659.GA31600@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 08:37:00 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org" <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] cramfs: add mmap support
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:30:50AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Unless you have a better scheme altogether to suggest of course, given
> the existing constraints.
I still can't understand why this convoluted fault path that finds
vma, attempts with all kinds of races and then tries to update things
like vm_ops is even nessecary.
We have direct mappings of physical address perfectly working in the
DAX code (even with write support!) or in drivers using remap_pfn_range
so a really good explanation why neither scheme can be used is needed
first.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists