[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171004061308.1246-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:43:08 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: pozdneyev@...il.com, acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
kjlx@...pleofstupid.com, milian.wolff@...b.com,
zhangmengting@...wei.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC] perf callchain: Compare dsos (as well) for CCKEY_FUNCTION
Two functions from different binaries can have same start
address. Thus, comparing only start address in match_chain()
leads to inconsistent callchains. Fix this by adding a check
for dsos as well.
Ex, https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg04067.html
Reported-by: Alexander Pozdneev <pozdneyev@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/util/callchain.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
index 510b513..6d5a483 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
@@ -678,6 +678,9 @@ static enum match_result match_chain(struct callchain_cursor_node *node,
{
struct symbol *sym = node->sym;
u64 left, right;
+ struct dso *left_dso = NULL;
+ struct dso *right_dso = NULL;
+
if (callchain_param.key == CCKEY_SRCLINE) {
enum match_result match = match_chain_srcline(node, cnode);
@@ -689,12 +692,16 @@ static enum match_result match_chain(struct callchain_cursor_node *node,
if (cnode->ms.sym && sym && callchain_param.key == CCKEY_FUNCTION) {
left = cnode->ms.sym->start;
right = sym->start;
+ if (cnode->ms.map && node->map) {
+ left_dso = cnode->ms.map->dso;
+ right_dso = node->map->dso;
+ }
} else {
left = cnode->ip;
right = node->ip;
}
- if (left == right) {
+ if (left == right && left_dso == right_dso) {
if (node->branch) {
cnode->branch_count++;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists