linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3] mm: Account pud page tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171004074305.x35eh5u7ybbt5kar@black.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:43:05 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] mm: Account pud page tables

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 06:03:47AM +0000, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 10:04 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On machine with 5-level paging support a process can allocate
> > significant amount of memory and stay unnoticed by oom-killer and
> > memory cgroup. The trick is to allocate a lot of PUD page tables.
> > We don't account PUD page tables, only PMD and PTE.
> > 
> > We already addressed the same issue for PMD page tables, see
> > dc6c9a35b66b ("mm: account pmd page tables to the process").
> > Introduction 5-level paging bring the same issue for PUD page tables.
> > 
> > The patch expands accounting to PUD level.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> 
> Small fix below:
> 
> > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> >  
> >  void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long text, lib, swap, ptes, pmds, anon, file, shmem;
> > +	unsigned long text, lib, swap, ptes, pmds, puds, anon, file, shmem;
> >  	unsigned long hiwater_vm, total_vm, hiwater_rss, total_rss;
> >  
> >  	anon = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  	swap = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
> >  	ptes = PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t) * atomic_long_read(&mm->nr_ptes);
> >  	pmds = PTRS_PER_PMD * sizeof(pmd_t) * mm_nr_pmds(mm);
> > +	puds = PTRS_PER_PUD * sizeof(pmd_t) * mm_nr_puds(mm);
> 
> 				     ^ pud_t ?

Ouch. Thanks for spotting this.

Andrew, could you take this fixup:

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 0bf9e423aa99..627de66204bd 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
 	swap = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
 	ptes = PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t) * atomic_long_read(&mm->nr_ptes);
 	pmds = PTRS_PER_PMD * sizeof(pmd_t) * mm_nr_pmds(mm);
-	puds = PTRS_PER_PUD * sizeof(pmd_t) * mm_nr_puds(mm);
+	puds = PTRS_PER_PUD * sizeof(pud_t) * mm_nr_puds(mm);
 	seq_printf(m,
 		"VmPeak:\t%8lu kB\n"
 		"VmSize:\t%8lu kB\n"
-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov