lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004075923.nl454dbxmvqivqy7@mwanda>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:59:24 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     "Stahl, Manuel" <manuel.stahl@...-extern.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:     "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>,
        Michal Sojka <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new uio device for PCI with dynamic memory allocation

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:24:49AM +0000, Stahl, Manuel wrote:
> Hi Dan. Thanks for your comments. I can fix all of those.
> Probably there is also some upgrade needed for the MSI stuff.
> pci_disable_msi() is not there anymore, so I have to use
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). Doing tests with my PCIe HW I had some
> problems with masking the legacy IRQs. Probably uio_pci_generic
> suffers from the same problems.
> 
> Can someone tell me how to properly handle legacy and MSI
> interrupts in irqhandler()? Or should I implement a irqcontrol()
> function?
>

These questions about above my pay grade.  I've never used the code, I
just do mechanical reviews.  I'm not certain who to ask either...

regards,
dan carpenter

 
> Best regards,
> Manuel Stahl
> 
> On Di, 2017-10-03 at 12:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Looks good.  A couple minor comments below.
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 03:02:09PM +0000, Stahl, Manuel wrote:
> > > +static int open(struct uio_info *info, struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct uio_pci_dmem_dev *priv = to_uio_pci_dmem_dev(info);
> > > +	struct uio_mem *uiomem;
> > > +	int ret = 0;
> > > +	int dmem_region = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	uiomem = &priv->info.mem[dmem_region];
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&priv->alloc_lock);
> > > +	while (!priv->refcnt && uiomem < &priv->info.mem[MAX_UIO_MAPS]) {
> > > +		void *addr;
> > > +
> > > +		if (!uiomem->size)
> > > +			break;
> > > +
> > > +		addr = dma_alloc_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev, uiomem->size,
> > > +					  (dma_addr_t *)&uiomem->addr,
> > > +					  GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +		if (!addr)
> > > +			uiomem->addr = DMEM_MAP_ERROR;
> > > +
> > > +		priv->dmem_region_vaddr[dmem_region++] = addr;
> > > +		++uiomem;
> > > +	}
> > > +	if (pci_check_and_mask_intx(priv->pdev))
> > > +		dev_info(&priv->pdev->dev, "Found pending interrupt");
> > > +
> > > +	if (!priv->refcnt)
> > > +		pci_set_master(priv->pdev);
> > > +
> > > +	priv->refcnt++;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&priv->alloc_lock);
> > > +
> > > +	return ret;
> > 
> > Just "return 0;" is more readable/explicit than "return ret;".
> > 
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int release(struct uio_info *info, struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct uio_pci_dmem_dev *priv = to_uio_pci_dmem_dev(info);
> > > +	struct uio_mem *uiomem;
> > > +	int dmem_region = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	uiomem = &priv->info.mem[dmem_region];
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&priv->alloc_lock);
> > > +
> > > +	priv->refcnt--;
> > > +	while (!priv->refcnt && uiomem < &priv->info.mem[MAX_UIO_MAPS]) {
> > > +		if (!uiomem->size)
> > > +			break;
> > 
> > I think this needs to be a continue instead of a break to match
> > parse_dmem_entries() since we don't break for size == 0 in that loop.
> > 
> > > +		if (priv->dmem_region_vaddr[dmem_region]) {
> > > +			dma_free_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev, uiomem->size,
> > > +					  priv->dmem_region_vaddr[dmem_region],
> > > +					  uiomem->addr);
> > > +		}
> > > +		uiomem->addr = DMEM_MAP_ERROR;
> > > +		++dmem_region;
> > > +		++uiomem;
> > > +	}
> > > +	if (pci_check_and_mask_intx(priv->pdev))
> > > +		dev_info(&priv->pdev->dev, "Found pending interrupt");
> > > +
> > > +	if (!priv->refcnt)
> > > +		pci_clear_master(priv->pdev);
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&priv->alloc_lock);
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int dmem_mmap(struct uio_info *info, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct uio_pci_dmem_dev *gdev = to_uio_pci_dmem_dev(info->priv);
> > > +	struct uio_mem *uiomem;
> > > +	int mi = vma->vm_pgoff;
> > > +
> > > +	if (mi >= MAX_UIO_MAPS)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	uiomem = &info->mem[mi];
> > > +	if (uiomem->memtype != UIO_MEM_PHYS)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	if (!uiomem->size)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* DMA address */
> > > +	vma->vm_pgoff = 0;
> > > +	return dma_mmap_coherent(&gdev->pdev->dev, vma,
> > > +				 gdev->dmem_region_vaddr[mi],
> > > +				 uiomem->addr, uiomem->size);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Interrupt handler. Read/modify/write the command register to disable the
> > > + * interrupt.
> > > + */
> > > +static irqreturn_t irqhandler(int irq, struct uio_info *info)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct uio_pci_dmem_dev *gdev = to_uio_pci_dmem_dev(info);
> > > +
> > > +	if (gdev->pdev->msi_enabled)
> > > +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > +
> > > +	if (pci_check_and_mask_intx(gdev->pdev))
> > > +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > +
> > > +	return IRQ_NONE;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned int uio_dmem_dma_bits = 32;
> > > +static char uio_dmem_sizes[256];
> > > +
> > > +static int parse_dmem_entries(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > +			      const struct pci_device_id *id,
> > > +			      struct uio_pci_dmem_dev *gdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +	u32 regions = 0;
> > > +	u32 vendor, device;
> > > +	char *s, *tok, *sizes = NULL;
> > > +	unsigned long long size;
> > > +	struct uio_mem *uiomem;
> > > +	char * const buf = kstrdup(uio_dmem_sizes, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!buf) {
> > > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > +		return ret;
> > 
> > I wish you wouldn't put the allocation in the declaration block...
> > Declaration blocks are a larger than expected source of static checker
> > bugs so I think they are not reviewed as carefully.  Anyway just do
> > "return -ENOMEM;" here instead of using a temporary variable.
> > 
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/* Find-out start and end of sizes list */
> > > +	s = buf;
> > > +	while (*s != '\0') {
> > > +		sizes = NULL;
> > > +		tok = strsep(&s, ":");
> > > +		if (!tok)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		ret = kstrtou32(tok, 16, &vendor);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		tok = strsep(&s, ":");
> > > +		if (!tok)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		ret = kstrtou32(tok, 16, &device);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		sizes = strsep(&s, ";");
> > > +		if (vendor == id->vendor && device == id->device)
> > > +			break;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	memset(gdev->info.mem, 0, sizeof(gdev->info.mem));
> > > +	if (sizes) {
> > > +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regions: %s\n", sizes);
> > > +
> > > +		/* Parse dynamic regions from sizes list */
> > > +		regions = 0;
> > > +		size = 0;
> > > +		s = sizes;
> > > +		while (s && (regions < MAX_UIO_MAPS)) {
> > > +			tok = strsep(&s, ",");
> > > +			if (!tok)
> > > +				break;
> > > +
> > > +			size = memparse(tok, NULL);
> > > +			if (size) {
> > > +				uiomem = &gdev->info.mem[regions];
> > > +				uiomem->memtype = UIO_MEM_PHYS;
> > > +				/* Will be allocated in open() call */
> > > +				uiomem->addr = DMEM_MAP_ERROR;
> > > +				uiomem->size = size;
> > > +				regions++;
> > > +			}
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (s)
> > > +			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "device has more than "
> > > +					__stringify(MAX_UIO_MAPS)
> > > +					" dynamic memory regions.\n");
> > > +	}
> > > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Found %d regions\n", regions);
> > > +
> > > +	kfree(buf);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct uio_pci_dmem_dev *gdev;
> > > +	int err;
> > > +
> > > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Probe %s for %04x:%04x\n", DRIVER_NAME,
> > > +		 id->vendor, id->device);
> > > +
> > > +	err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > > +	if (err) {
> > > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: pci_enable_device failed: %d\n",
> > > +			__func__, err);
> > > +		return err;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Legacy IRQ: %i", pdev->irq);
> > > +	/* Try to use MSI interrupts */
> > > +	pci_enable_msi_range(pdev, 1, 1);
> > > +	if (pdev->irq && !pci_intx_mask_supported(pdev)) {
> > > +		err = -ENODEV;
> > > +		goto err_disable_pci;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	gdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*gdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +	if (!gdev) {
> > > +		err = -ENOMEM;
> > > +		goto err_disable_pci;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	gdev->info.name = DRIVER_NAME;
> > > +	gdev->info.version = DRIVER_VERSION;
> > > +	gdev->info.irq = pdev->irq;
> > > +	gdev->info.irq_flags = IRQF_SHARED;
> > > +	gdev->info.handler = irqhandler;
> > > +	gdev->info.open = open;
> > > +	gdev->info.release = release;
> > > +	gdev->info.mmap = dmem_mmap;
> > > +	gdev->info.priv = gdev;
> > > +	gdev->pdev = pdev;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Set DMA coherent mask */
> > > +	if (uio_dmem_dma_bits > 64)
> > > +		uio_dmem_dma_bits = 64;
> > > +	err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev,
> > > +				    DMA_BIT_MASK(uio_dmem_dma_bits));
> > > +	if (err) {
> > > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to dma_set_coherent_mask\n");
> > > +		goto err_free_gdev;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	err = parse_dmem_entries(pdev, id, gdev);
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		goto err_free_gdev;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_init(&gdev->alloc_lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (uio_register_device(&pdev->dev, &gdev->info))
> > > +		goto err_free_gdev;
> > 
> > Preserve the error code from uio_register_device().
> > 
> > > +	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, gdev);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +err_free_gdev:
> > > +	kfree(gdev);
> > > +err_disable_pci:
> > > +	pci_disable_msi(pdev);
> > > +	pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > > +	return err;
> > > +}
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ