[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96f8c550-da66-c11f-4db4-34fe520188aa@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:07:18 -0700
From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Souvik Kumar Chakravarty <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 4/7] platform: x86: Add generic Intel IPC driver
Hi,
On 10/01/2017 07:59 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:37 AM,
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Currently intel_scu_ipc.c, intel_pmc_ipc.c and intel_punit_ipc.c
>> redundantly implements the same IPC features and has lot of code
>> duplication between them. This driver addresses this issue by grouping
>> the common IPC functionalities under the same driver.
>> +static const char *ipc_dev_err_string(struct intel_ipc_dev *ipc_dev,
>> + int error)
>> +{
>> + switch (error) {
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_NONE:
>> + return "No error";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_NOT_SUPPORTED:
>> + return "Command not-supported/Invalid";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_NOT_SERVICED:
>> + return "Command not-serviced/Invalid param";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_UNABLE_TO_SERVICE:
>> + return "Unable-to-service/Cmd-timeout";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_INVALID:
>> + return "Command-invalid/Cmd-locked";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_CMD_FAILED:
>> + return "Command-failed/Invalid-VR-id";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_EMSECURITY:
>> + return "Invalid Battery/VR-Error";
>> + case IPC_DEV_ERR_UNSIGNEDKERNEL:
>> + return "Unsigned kernel";
>> + default:
>> + return "Unknown Command";
>> + };
>> +}
> Since it's continuous list you can define an array of messages like
>
> const char * const *errors = {
> [..._ERR_...] = "",
> ...
>
> };
>
> Also you can use enum in the header and define _ERR_MAX there.
> Thus, code would be transformed to
>
> if (error < _ERR_MAX)
> return errors[error];
>
> return "Unknown Command";
Thanks will fix it in next version.
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists