[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004103119.sedmwqcfwu3ze5od@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:31:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKP <lkp@...org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at 000001f2
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yes, I'll do that tomorrow. I was always a bit unhappy about cross-release,
> > because it breaks the 'owner task owns the lock' model.
>
> Still, you can get real deadlocks with completions...
>
> > Plus I don't think we found that many real bugs with it
>
> Every bug found is one less bug. It did find a few.
Certainly, but the total work saved by finding bugs should be balanced against the
additional fragility of lockdep and the ongoing maintenance cost.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists