[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1tk20bxh5u.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 13:54:05 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Guy Shattah <sguy@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mmap(MAP_CONTIG)
On Tue, Oct 03 2017, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> At Plumbers this year, Guy Shattah and Christoph Lameter gave a presentation
> titled 'User space contiguous memory allocation for DMA' [1]. The slides
> point out the performance benefits of devices that can take advantage of
> larger physically contiguous areas.
Issue I have is that kind of memory needed may depend on a device. Some
may require contiguous blocks. Some may support scatter-gather. Some
may be behind IO-MMU and not care either way.
Furthermore, I feel déjà vu. Wasn’t dmabuf supposed to address this
issue?
--
Best regards
ミハウ “𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪86” ナザレヴイツ
«If at first you don’t succeed, give up skydiving»
Powered by blists - more mailing lists