[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004124819.GU3611@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:48:19 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
matwey.kornilov@...il.com, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable MRS emulation early
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:36:29PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:32:07PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
[...]
> > I don't think the hwcaps shouldn't change after entry to userspace,
> > so it really doesn't matter whether HWCAP_CPUID is set before or
> > after registration: for userspace it should all already have happened.
>
> Good point, I forgot about this.
>
> > It looks to me like all initcalls are called in the same kernel thread
> > that execs the initramfs init process, before the exec.
> >
> > So I still don't see how a built-in late initcall can not have been
> > called before entry to userspace.
> >
> > The patch seems to demonstrate that I'm wrong though.
> > What am I missing?
>
> I also wondered about this. I think is the kernel invoking modprobe
> before the actual init/linuxrc in an initrd.
Ah, right. Could that be a bug, do you think?
I wonder whether it's even well-defined how early that can happen.
i.e., which initcall level is guaranteed early enough to prevent this?
Cheers
---Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists