lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 15:26:50 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        William Roberts <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
        Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>,
        Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [RFC V2 1/6] lib: vsprintf: additional kernel
 pointer filtering options

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:08:57AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:55:42 +0200
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:06:45AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > > Add the kptr_restrict setting of 3 which results in both
> > > %p and %pK values being replaced by zeros.
> > > 
> > > Add an additional %pP value inspired by the Grsecurity
> > > option which explicitly whitelists pointers for output.
> > > 
> > > Amend scripts/checkpatch.pl to handle %pP.
> > > 
> > > This patch is based on work by William Roberts
> > > <william.c.roberts@...el.com>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>  
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Greg,
> 
> I'm curious to why you are adding a "Signed-off-by"? That usually means
> that you either help author it, or it is going through your tree. I've
> never seen a "Signed-off-by" in passing. That's usually a "Acked-by" or
> "Reviewed-by".

I did help author it :)

Hope that helps,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ