linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] gpio: brcmstb: enable masking of interrupts when changing type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5b38f92b-47a9-c75e-dd4e-3f1f907f1359@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2017 19:22:33 -0700
From:   Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
To:     Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] gpio: brcmstb: enable masking of interrupts when
 changing type

On 10/03/2017 07:10 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com> wrote:
>> Mask the GPIO interrupt while its type is being changed, just in case
>> it can prevent a spurious interrupt.
> 
> "Just in case"?  I don't have access to hardware documentation for
> this anymore, but I'd expect to some stronger claim that the hardware
> actually requires masking before changing the trigger type.  If you
> can quote documentation for this or explain an actual problem seen,
> that would be good.

Well spotted ;).  This was a protectionist change added at the request
of a user of the driver.  I believe that it is superfluous and I suppose
that belief leaked through in the language of my comment.

In actuality, the GPIO APIs don't make provision for clearing GPIO
interrupts before enabling them so this masking is really only a
deferral of a spurious interrupt if one is triggered by changes in the
hardware programming.

I can strike this from the upstream submission and save a couple lines
of source code (after IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND goes away) if you prefer.

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
>> index 0418cb266586..e2fff559c1ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
>> @@ -363,7 +363,9 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>         bank->irq_chip.irq_set_type = brcmstb_gpio_irq_set_type;
>>
>>         /* Ensures that all non-wakeup IRQs are disabled at suspend */
>> -       bank->irq_chip.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
>> +       /* and that interrupts are masked when changing their type  */
> 
> This doesn't follow the kernel multi-line comment style, please adjust.
> 
>> +       bank->irq_chip.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND |
>> +                              IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED;
>>
>>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && !priv->parent_wake_irq &&
>>                         of_property_read_bool(np, "wakeup-source")) {
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> Gregory
> 

Thanks again,
    Doug