linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] early_printk: Add simple serialization to early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:38:29 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, pmladek@...e.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] early_printk: Add simple serialization to
 early_vprintk()

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:24:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 07:17:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > If you use READ_ONCE(), then all architectures I know of enforce
> > full ordering for accesses to a single variable.  (If you don't use
> > READ_ONCE(), then in theory Itanium can reorder reads.)  Me, I would
> > argue for WRITE_ONCE() as well to prevent store tearing.
> 
> Note that the stores are either cmpxchg() or smp_store_release() both of
> which imply a WRITE_ONCE().

That works for me!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul