linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] wireless: iwlwifi: function definition cosmetic fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1507133610.908.89.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:13:30 +0300
From:   Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To:     Christoph Böhmwalder 
        <christoph@...hmwalder.at>, johannes.berg@...el.com,
        emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] wireless: iwlwifi: function definition cosmetic fix

On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 17:56 +0200, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> Separate the function from the previous definition with a newline and
> put the `static` keyword on the same line, as it just looks nicer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph@...hmwalder.at>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c
> index 0eb815ae97e8..249ee1c7b02f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c
> @@ -325,8 +325,8 @@ static u16 channel_id_to_txp(struct iwl_phy_db *phy_db, u16 ch_id)
>  	}
>  	return 0xff;
>  }
> -static
> -int iwl_phy_db_get_section_data(struct iwl_phy_db *phy_db,
> +
> +static int iwl_phy_db_get_section_data(struct iwl_phy_db *phy_db,
>  				u32 type, u8 **data, u16 *size, u16 ch_id)
>  {
>  	struct iwl_phy_db_entry *entry;

Sorry, but this now looks much uglier because the second line is not
even aligned to the parenthesis.

NACK.

--
Luca.