[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <128f8fd1-52e7-e9a7-5bb0-317540e2f449@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:18:24 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v5 08/31] KVM: Introduce
KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REGISTER_REGION ioctl
On 10/04/2017 10:19 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REGISTER_REGION _IOR(KVMIO, 0xbb,\
>> + struct kvm_enc_region)
>> +#define KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_UNREGISTER_REGION _IOR(KVMIO, 0xbc,\
>> + struct kvm_enc_region)
>
> Yuck, those are needlessly too long. They could be just as understandable if
> they were called:
>
> #define KVM_MEM_ENC_REG_REGION _IOR(KVMIO, 0xbb, struct kvm_enc_region)
> #define KVM_MEM_ENC_UNREG_REGION _IOR(KVMIO, 0xbc, struct kvm_enc_region)
>
> or so... I know, it'll need to change the qemu patches but it is more
> compact this way, IMO, and you don't have to break the _IOR line.
>
Thanks for the patch Boris, I will take care of removing the wrapper
from kvm_vm_ioctl_mem_enc_op(). As per shorting the name is concerned,
if am open to suggestion. lets see if Paolo or Radim have any comments
on naming. If not, then I will shorten the name in next rev.
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists