[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SG2PR06MB1165A0C7FA2194F1E6013F6B8A700@SG2PR06MB1165.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 23:49:20 +0000
From: Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org" <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/5] cramfs: add mmap support
On Thursday, October 05, 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Do you have the same amount of free memory once booted in both cases?
Yes, almost exactly the same, so obvious it must be working the same for
both cases. That's enough evidence for me.
Thanks.
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists