[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005104051.shazuwnqbqjj3be2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:40:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide
RCU quiescent state
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:50:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 26a7df4e558c..59688ef3ea23 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1565,10 +1565,11 @@ static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
> * cond_resched_lock() will drop the spinlock before scheduling,
> * cond_resched_softirq() will enable bhs before scheduling.
> */
> +void rcu_all_qs(void);
> #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> extern int _cond_resched(void);
> #else
> -static inline int _cond_resched(void) { return 0; }
> +static inline int _cond_resched(void) { rcu_all_qs(); return 0; }
> #endif
Why does it need to change PREEMPT? the whole cond_resched() thing
should be a no-op on PREEMPT.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists