[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <2081590.uFvUN0fvNT@amdc3058>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:55:49 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 13/15] mmc: block: Add CQE and blk-mq support
On Wednesday, October 04, 2017 11:48:27 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> MQ code that doesn't perform and therefore we cannot switch seamlessly
> >> to MQ.
> >
> > I think that switching seamlessly to blk-mq in short/medium-term
> > is not possible (SCSI tried and failed to do so). The changes to
> > the old path are very complex and besides affecting performance
> > they also affect error recovery handling (which needs to be tested
> > properly before the switch).
>
> Agreed, and that's why I have queued up the new Kconfig option for
> enabling the blkmq path from MMC.
This seems premature - the new Kconfig option change for "mmc-mq" should
belong to the patch adding "mmc-mq" support (otherwise it may just confuse
users who enable it).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists