[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507203273.29707.0.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 06:34:33 -0500
From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
rajvi.jingar@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/33] ring-buffer: Add interface for setting
absolute time stamps
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 13:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:59:43 -0500
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > + * New timestamps may not be consistent with the previous setting.
> > + * Reset the buffer so that it doesn't have incomparable timestamps.
>
> I would like to make the ring buffer robust enough to handle both. Can
> this be done?
>
Probably - I'll take a look at doing this for V4...
Tom
> -- Steve
>
> > + */
> > + tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->trace_buffer);
> > +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists