linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: fix non-SMP build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXjD-MpW9sqKtdUasizN8YkWuzChNyduyHz7p-cz38VBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:25:23 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: fix non-SMP build

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> A bugfix for the SMP case broke the build for the UP case:
>
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.o: In function `shmobile_boot_apmu':
> (.text+0x34): undefined reference to `secondary_startup'
>
> The assembler file mixes code that is used for SMP with code
> that we also need on a single-CPU build, so I'm leaving it
> always enabled in the Makefile, but enclose the SMP code
> in an #ifdef.

Oops, sorry for that. Looks like 0-day doesn't do UP builds?

> 3fd45a136ff6 ("ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Make sure CNTVOFF is initialized on CA7/15")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> ;-)

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S
> index db4743d2bf91..5672b5849401 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S

As this hasn't been pulled into arm-soc yet (pull request sent though),
perhaps Simon should squash this fix into the original commit?
Should we rename headsmp-apmu.S to head-apmu.S?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds