[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <622bfd9d-69df-9d78-d72b-5bd49d979afa@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:32:12 -0400
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/nes: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
On 10/4/2017 8:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. A pointer from nesadapter back to
> nesdev was added.
>
> Cc: Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>
> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
> Cc: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
> Cc: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> This requires commit 686fef928bba ("timer: Prepare to change timer
> callback argument type") in v4.14-rc3, but should be otherwise
> stand-alone.
What is your intention with this, and the other RDMA related, patches?
Is it your intention that I should pick these up or is someone else
supposed to (you sent it to linux-kernel and only Cc:ed linux-rdma)?
Also, are you intending this to go into -rc? If so, why is it dependent
on a patch that didn't land until -rc3?
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG Key ID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (885 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists