lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:57:40 +0100
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        "Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
        "Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Sasha Levin" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Preallocate mmu notifier to unbreak cpu hotplug
 deadlock

Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-10-05 14:22:06)
> 4.14-rc1 gained the fancy new cross-release support in lockdep, which
> seems to have uncovered a few more rules about what is allowed and
> isn't.
> 
> This one here seems to indicate that allocating a work-queue while
> holding mmap_sem is a no-go, so let's try to preallocate it.
> 
> Of course another way to break this chain would be somewhere in the
> cpu hotplug code, since this isn't the only trace we're finding now
> which goes through msr_create_device.
> 
> Full lockdep splat:
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 4.14.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_3179+ #1 Tainted: G     U
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kworker/3:4/562 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: [<ffffffff8113d4bc>] stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0136588>] i915_reset_device+0x1e8/0x260 [i915]
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> 
> -> #6 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}:
>        __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>        lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>        __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9b0
>        mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x1b/0x20
>        i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x51/0x130 [i915]
>        i915_gem_fault+0x209/0x650 [i915]
>        __do_fault+0x1e/0x80
>        __handle_mm_fault+0xa08/0xed0
>        handle_mm_fault+0x156/0x300
>        __do_page_fault+0x2c5/0x570
>        do_page_fault+0x28/0x250
>        page_fault+0x22/0x30
> 
> -> #5 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
>        __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>        lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>        __might_fault+0x68/0x90
>        _copy_to_user+0x23/0x70
>        filldir+0xa5/0x120
>        dcache_readdir+0xf9/0x170
>        iterate_dir+0x69/0x1a0
>        SyS_getdents+0xa5/0x140
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1
> 
> -> #4 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}:
>        down_write+0x3b/0x70
>        handle_create+0xcb/0x1e0
>        devtmpfsd+0x139/0x180
>        kthread+0x152/0x190
>        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> 
> -> #3 ((complete)&req.done){+.+.}:
>        __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>        lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>        wait_for_common+0x58/0x210
>        wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
>        devtmpfs_create_node+0x13d/0x160
>        device_add+0x5eb/0x620
>        device_create_groups_vargs+0xe0/0xf0
>        device_create+0x3a/0x40
>        msr_device_create+0x2b/0x40
>        cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc9/0xbf0
>        cpuhp_thread_fun+0x17b/0x240
>        smpboot_thread_fn+0x18a/0x280
>        kthread+0x152/0x190
>        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> 
> -> #2 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}:
>        __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>        lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>        cpuhp_issue_call+0x133/0x1c0
>        __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x139/0x2a0
>        __cpuhp_setup_state+0x46/0x60
>        page_writeback_init+0x43/0x67
>        pagecache_init+0x3d/0x42
>        start_kernel+0x3a8/0x3fc
>        x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
>        x86_64_start_kernel+0x6d/0x70
>        verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb
> 
> -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}:
>        __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>        lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>        __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9b0
>        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
>        __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x53/0x2a0
>        __cpuhp_setup_state+0x46/0x60
>        page_alloc_init+0x28/0x30
>        start_kernel+0x145/0x3fc
>        x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
>        x86_64_start_kernel+0x6d/0x70
>        verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb
> 
> -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
>        check_prev_add+0x430/0x840
>        __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>        lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>        cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0
>        stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
>        i915_gem_set_wedged+0x1a/0x20 [i915]
>        i915_reset+0xb9/0x230 [i915]
>        i915_reset_device+0x1f6/0x260 [i915]
>        i915_handle_error+0x2d8/0x430 [i915]
>        hangcheck_declare_hang+0xd3/0xf0 [i915]
>        i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x262/0x2d0 [i915]
>        process_one_work+0x233/0x660
>        worker_thread+0x4e/0x3b0
>        kthread+0x152/0x190
>        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> Chain exists of:
>   cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> &mm->mmap_sem --> &dev->struct_mutex
> 
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>                                lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
>                                lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
> 
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 3 locks held by kworker/3:4/562:
>  #0:  ("events_long"){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109c64a>] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x660
>  #1:  ((&(&i915->gpu_error.hangcheck_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109c64a>] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x660
>  #2:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0136588>] i915_reset_device+0x1e8/0x260 [i915]
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 3 PID: 562 Comm: kworker/3:4 Tainted: G     U          4.14.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_3179+ #1
> Hardware name:                  /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0048.2017.0704.1415 07/04/2017
> Workqueue: events_long i915_hangcheck_elapsed [i915]
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0x68/0x9f
>  print_circular_bug+0x235/0x3c0
>  ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
>  check_prev_add+0x430/0x840
>  ? irq_work_queue+0x86/0xe0
>  ? wake_up_klogd+0x53/0x70
>  __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>  ? __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0
>  ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
>  lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200
>  ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
>  ? i915_gem_object_truncate+0x50/0x50 [i915]
>  cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0
>  ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
>  stop_machine+0x1c/0x40
>  i915_gem_set_wedged+0x1a/0x20 [i915]
>  i915_reset+0xb9/0x230 [i915]
>  i915_reset_device+0x1f6/0x260 [i915]
>  ? gen8_gt_irq_ack+0x170/0x170 [i915]
>  ? work_on_cpu_safe+0x60/0x60
>  i915_handle_error+0x2d8/0x430 [i915]
>  ? vsnprintf+0xd1/0x4b0
>  ? scnprintf+0x3a/0x70
>  hangcheck_declare_hang+0xd3/0xf0 [i915]
>  ? intel_runtime_pm_put+0x56/0xa0 [i915]
>  i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x262/0x2d0 [i915]
>  process_one_work+0x233/0x660
>  worker_thread+0x4e/0x3b0
>  kthread+0x152/0x190
>  ? process_one_work+0x660/0x660
>  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
>  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
> Setting dangerous option reset - tainting kernel
> i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang
> Setting dangerous option reset - tainting kernel
> i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang

Fwiw, this does not occur on machines with
# CONFI_X86_MSR is not set
-Chris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists