[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005145454.v52uzhzqtqshtksc@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:55:08 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Fix alt_max_short macro to really be a
max()
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:35:33PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Oh, btw., quoting its counter part from arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h:
>
> /*
> * max without conditionals. Idea adapted from:
> * http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#IntegerMinOrMax
> */
> #define alt_max_short(a, b) ((a) ^ (((a) ^ (b)) & -(-((a) < (b)))))
>
> Note the "<"! ...comment is wrong, though the implementation works!
Ok, please fix that comment in alternative-asm.h and add
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
to v2 before sending it.
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists