[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171005155441.72mjaac5c42rjilf@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:54:41 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.12-rt13
On 2017-10-04 18:07:59 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Seems combo-patch induced some ltp posix conformance test grumbling.
>
> +clock_settime_8_1 ... ... FAILED
> +clock_settime_4_2 ... ... FAILED
> +clock_settime_speculative_4_3 ... ... FAILED
> +timer_settime_5_2 ... ... FAILED
> +timer_settime_5_1 ... ... FAILED
> +timer_settime_5_3 ... ... FAILED
>
> rtbox:/root # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test
> Ended too late. 1507131910 >> 1507131908
> Test FAILED
> rtbox:/root # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_4-2.run-test
> timer should have expired _immediately_
> rtbox:/root # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/speculative/clock_settime_speculative_4-3.run-test
> Overrun count =0, not # of repeating timer expirys
> FAIL: Caught 0 signals, not 1
> Test FAILED
> rtbox:/root # /opt/ltp/conformance/interfaces/timer_settime/timer_settime_5-2.run-test
> signal was not sent
So the last triggers here, too and I have an idea.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists