[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <312162.31738.1507219326334.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:02:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
dipankar <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
fweisbec <fweisbec@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
maged michael <maged.michael@...il.com>,
gromer <gromer@...gle.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] membarrier: Provide register expedited
private command
----- On Oct 5, 2017, at 8:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:37:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/membarrier.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/membarrier.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b0d79a5f5981
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/membarrier.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>
>> +void membarrier_arch_register_private_expedited(struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *t;
>> +
>> + if (get_nr_threads(p) == 1) {
>> + set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + /*
>> + * Coherence of TIF_MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED against thread
>> + * fork is protected by siglock.
>> + */
>> + spin_lock(&p->sighand->siglock);
>> + for_each_thread(p, t)
>> + set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(t),
>> + TIF_MEMBARRIER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED);
>
> I'm not sure this works correctly vs CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD.
The intent here is to hold the sighand siglock to provide mutual
exclusion against invocation of membarrier_fork(p, clone_flags)
by copy_process().
copy_process() grabs spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock) for both
CLONE_THREAD and not CLONE_THREAD flags.
What am I missing here ?
>
>> + spin_unlock(&p->sighand->siglock);
>> + /*
>> + * Ensure all future scheduler executions will observe the new
>> + * thread flag state for this process.
>> + */
>> + synchronize_sched();
>
> This relies on the flag being read inside rq->lock, right?
Yes. The flag is read by membarrier_arch_switch_mm(), invoked
within switch_mm_irqs_off(), called by context_switch() before
finish_task_switch() releases the rq lock.
Is the comment clear enough, or do you have suggestions for
improvements ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> > +}
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists