linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: sh: aica: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hinftpl6d.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:19:06 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        moderated for non-subscribers <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: sh: aica: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:17:16 +0200,
Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 02:53:36 +0200,
> > Kees Cook wrote:
> >>
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. This requires adding a pointer to
> >> hold the timer's target substream, as there won't be a way to pass this in
> >> the future.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
> >> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
> >> Cc: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
> >> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> >> Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >> ---
> >> This requires commit 686fef928bba ("timer: Prepare to change timer
> >> callback argument type") in v4.14-rc3, but should be otherwise
> >> stand-alone.
> >
> > The conversions look straightforward, so I'm going to apply it (and
> > other two you posted).  But now I wonder why only three were chosen.
> > Will you keep working on the rest usages in sound/*, or would you
> > expect us doing the rest?
> 
> Hi, thanks for applying them!
> 
> I'm working my way through the "non-trivial" changes first. I have a
> coccinelle script that will do a mass-conversion of the common cases.
> It's possible that those changes cover the other usages in sound/* or
> that I haven't made my way through the others yet (it's a very long
> list). I wouldn't object to other people helping with the conversions,
> of course. :)

OK, scripting is a better way, then I'd save my time and wait until
you get more systematic coverage, then :)


thanks,

Takashi