[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vec=VX9CZSzBWDX5YCEKSoAn=B0403g+1Xhg4Jo5g00HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:22:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
Cc: "dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, quasisec@...gle.com,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, mjg59@...gle.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] platform/x86: dell-wmi: increase severity of
some failures
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:02 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com> wrote:
>> > - if (strncmp(obj->string.pointer, "DELL WMI", 8) != 0)
>> > - dev_warn(&wdev->dev, "Dell descriptor buffer has invalid signature
>> (%8ph)\n",
>> > + if (strncmp(obj->string.pointer, "DELL WMI", 8) != 0) {
>> > + dev_err(&wdev->dev, "Dell descriptor buffer has invalid signature
>> (%8ph)\n",
>>
>> A nit: ping-pong programming detected.
>> Looks like current patch 2 should go at least after this one.
> I'll re-order them, but either way both patches are touching these lines in some
> way.
Yeah, I noticed as well.
The rule of thumb is to arrange such small and non-so-important clean
ups at the tail of the series (as possible).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists