[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5dcb727-cd7a-0e19-cf9a-8d2e5dd5f258@c-s.fr>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:57:24 +0200
From: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Default to enabling STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
Le 05/10/2017 à 19:30, Kees Cook a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Christophe LEROY
> <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 05/10/2017 à 05:45, Kees Cook a écrit :
>>>
>>> When available, CONFIG_KERNEL_RWX should be default-enabled.
>>
>>
>> On PPC32, this option implies deactivating BATs and/or LTLB mapping of the
>> linear kernel address space, hence a significant performance degradation.
>>
>> So at least on PPC32, it should remain unselected by default.
>
> Alright, sounds fine to me. Would this be okay?
>
> + select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT if !PPC64
You mean
select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT if PPC64
Don't you ?
Christophe
>
> -Kees
>
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>>> index 809c468edab1..9a549bbfc278 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ config PPC
>>> select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
>>> select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if ((PPC_BOOK3S_64 ||
>>> PPC32) && !RELOCATABLE && !HIBERNATION)
>>> select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if
>>> ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>>> + select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT
>>> select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if !PPC64
>>> select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING if PPC64
>>> select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>>>
>>
>
>
>
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists