[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171006083851.631812884@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:51:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 073/104] netfilter: invoke synchronize_rcu after set the _hook_ to NULL
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 3b7dabf029478bb80507a6c4500ca94132a2bc0b ]
Otherwise, another CPU may access the invalid pointer. For example:
CPU0 CPU1
- rcu_read_lock();
- pfunc = _hook_;
_hook_ = NULL; -
mod unload -
- pfunc(); // invalid, panic
- rcu_read_unlock();
So we must call synchronize_rcu() to wait the rcu reader to finish.
Also note, in nf_nat_snmp_basic_fini, synchronize_rcu() will be invoked
by later nf_conntrack_helper_unregister, but I'm inclined to add a
explicit synchronize_rcu after set the nf_nat_snmp_hook to NULL. Depend
on such obscure assumptions is not a good idea.
Last, in nfnetlink_cttimeout, we use kfree_rcu to free the time object,
so in cttimeout_exit, invoking rcu_barrier() is not necessary at all,
remove it too.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c | 2 ++
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 2 ++
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,7 @@ static int __init nf_nat_snmp_basic_init
static void __exit nf_nat_snmp_basic_fini(void)
{
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_nat_snmp_hook, NULL);
+ synchronize_rcu();
nf_conntrack_helper_unregister(&snmp_trap_helper);
}
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ void nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier(st
BUG_ON(notify != new);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(net->ct.nf_conntrack_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
+ /* synchronize_rcu() is called from ctnetlink_exit. */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier);
@@ -326,6 +327,7 @@ void nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier(st
BUG_ON(notify != new);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(net->ct.nf_expect_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
+ /* synchronize_rcu() is called from ctnetlink_exit. */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier);
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -3413,6 +3413,7 @@ static void __exit ctnetlink_exit(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_GLUE_CT
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nfnl_ct_hook, NULL);
#endif
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
module_init(ctnetlink_init);
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -892,6 +892,8 @@ static void __exit nf_nat_cleanup(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_nat_decode_session_hook, NULL);
#endif
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
for (i = 0; i < NFPROTO_NUMPROTO; i++)
kfree(nf_nat_l4protos[i]);
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
@@ -646,8 +646,8 @@ static void __exit cttimeout_exit(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_ct_timeout_find_get_hook, NULL);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_ct_timeout_put_hook, NULL);
+ synchronize_rcu();
#endif /* CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT */
- rcu_barrier();
}
module_init(cttimeout_init);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists