lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171006083705.888617839@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  6 Oct 2017 10:52:52 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 04/50] RDS: RDMA: Fix the composite message user notification

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>


[ Upstream commit 941f8d55f6d613a460a5e080d25a38509f45eb75 ]

When application sends an RDS RDMA composite message consist of
RDMA transfer to be followed up by non RDMA payload, it expect to
be notified *only* when the full message gets delivered. RDS RDMA
notification doesn't behave this way though.

Thanks to Venkat for debug and root casuing the issue
where only first part of the message(RDMA) was
successfully delivered but remainder payload delivery failed.
In that case, application should not be notified with
a false positive of message delivery success.

Fix this case by making sure the user gets notified only after
the full message delivery.

Reviewed-by: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/rds/ib_send.c |   25 +++++++++++++++----------
 net/rds/rdma.c    |   10 ++++++++++
 net/rds/rds.h     |    1 +
 net/rds/send.c    |    4 +++-
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/net/rds/ib_send.c
+++ b/net/rds/ib_send.c
@@ -68,16 +68,6 @@ static void rds_ib_send_complete(struct
 	complete(rm, notify_status);
 }
 
-static void rds_ib_send_unmap_data(struct rds_ib_connection *ic,
-				   struct rm_data_op *op,
-				   int wc_status)
-{
-	if (op->op_nents)
-		ib_dma_unmap_sg(ic->i_cm_id->device,
-				op->op_sg, op->op_nents,
-				DMA_TO_DEVICE);
-}
-
 static void rds_ib_send_unmap_rdma(struct rds_ib_connection *ic,
 				   struct rm_rdma_op *op,
 				   int wc_status)
@@ -138,6 +128,21 @@ static void rds_ib_send_unmap_atomic(str
 		rds_ib_stats_inc(s_ib_atomic_fadd);
 }
 
+static void rds_ib_send_unmap_data(struct rds_ib_connection *ic,
+				   struct rm_data_op *op,
+				   int wc_status)
+{
+	struct rds_message *rm = container_of(op, struct rds_message, data);
+
+	if (op->op_nents)
+		ib_dma_unmap_sg(ic->i_cm_id->device,
+				op->op_sg, op->op_nents,
+				DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+
+	if (rm->rdma.op_active && rm->data.op_notify)
+		rds_ib_send_unmap_rdma(ic, &rm->rdma, wc_status);
+}
+
 /*
  * Unmap the resources associated with a struct send_work.
  *
--- a/net/rds/rdma.c
+++ b/net/rds/rdma.c
@@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ int rds_cmsg_rdma_args(struct rds_sock *
 		}
 		op->op_notifier->n_user_token = args->user_token;
 		op->op_notifier->n_status = RDS_RDMA_SUCCESS;
+
+		/* Enable rmda notification on data operation for composite
+		 * rds messages and make sure notification is enabled only
+		 * for the data operation which follows it so that application
+		 * gets notified only after full message gets delivered.
+		 */
+		if (rm->data.op_sg) {
+			rm->rdma.op_notify = 0;
+			rm->data.op_notify = !!(args->flags & RDS_RDMA_NOTIFY_ME);
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* The cookie contains the R_Key of the remote memory region, and
--- a/net/rds/rds.h
+++ b/net/rds/rds.h
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ struct rds_message {
 		} rdma;
 		struct rm_data_op {
 			unsigned int		op_active:1;
+			unsigned int		op_notify:1;
 			unsigned int		op_nents;
 			unsigned int		op_count;
 			unsigned int		op_dmasg;
--- a/net/rds/send.c
+++ b/net/rds/send.c
@@ -467,12 +467,14 @@ void rds_rdma_send_complete(struct rds_m
 	struct rm_rdma_op *ro;
 	struct rds_notifier *notifier;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int notify = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rm->m_rs_lock, flags);
 
+	notify =  rm->rdma.op_notify | rm->data.op_notify;
 	ro = &rm->rdma;
 	if (test_bit(RDS_MSG_ON_SOCK, &rm->m_flags) &&
-	    ro->op_active && ro->op_notify && ro->op_notifier) {
+	    ro->op_active && notify && ro->op_notifier) {
 		notifier = ro->op_notifier;
 		rs = rm->m_rs;
 		sock_hold(rds_rs_to_sk(rs));


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ