linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 010/104] MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+7wUsyJMPeTD0Mm=wkshU01fyS=Qa6iZKLJN9==vTWeSjk2Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:21:18 +0200
From:   Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 010/104] MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 11:10:11AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Please do not apply to stable.
>>
>> See: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17235/
>
> Ah, so will you send this and that one for 4.9 when it hits Linus's
> tree?
>
> I'll go drop this one now, thanks.

Sorry I meant to say do not apply to '4.9 stable branch'. For the
other stable branches, I suspect this is just a matter of days before
Ralf sends the updated fix.

-M