[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD008BB4D@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:11:42 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Michal Hocko' <mhocko@...nel.org>
CC: 'Pavel Tatashin' <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"sam@...nborg.org" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"steven.sistare@...cle.com" <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
"daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com" <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
"bob.picco@...cle.com" <bob.picco@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 09/10] mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in
vmemmap
From: Michal Hocko
> Sent: 06 October 2017 12:47
> On Fri 06-10-17 11:10:14, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Pavel Tatashin
> > > Sent: 05 October 2017 22:11
> > > vmemmap_alloc_block() will no longer zero the block, so zero memory
> > > at its call sites for everything except struct pages. Struct page memory
> > > is zero'd by struct page initialization.
> >
> > It seems dangerous to change an allocator to stop zeroing memory.
> > It is probably saver to add a new function that doesn't zero
> > the memory and use that is the places where you don't want it
> > to be zeroed.
>
> Not sure what you mean. memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw is a new
> function which doesn't zero out...
You should probably leave vmemap_alloc_block() zeroing the memory
so that existing alls don't have to be changed - apart from the
ones you are explicitly optimising.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists