[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171006123203.GM21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:32:03 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
computersforpeace@...il.com, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix C++ kernel in include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:13:59PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2017-10-06 13:01:16, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 14:00 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017, 13:55:14 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's carry it via MTD.
> > > > > BTW: Shouldn't it be s/kernel/comment/ in the subject line?
> > > > Yes, it should. Can it be fixed while applying?
> > > Sure. :)
> >
> > You can change 'C++' to 'C99' too, while you're at it :)
>
> No. They are C++ comments... as in... dangerous infection that came
> from C++. Yes, C99 is infected, too, but still C++ is original source
> of infection :-).
No, it is not. See https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/bcpl.html and
scans refered therein; let's keep snobbery historically accurate...
IOW, it's not C++ invention - it's BCPL one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists