[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171006125423.vwxrw6z7nsiamqol@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:54:23 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
bart.vanassche@....com, ming.lei@...hat.com,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, jikos@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
len.brown@...el.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com, nborisov@...e.com, jack@...e.cz,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, ONeukum@...e.com,
oleksandr@...alenko.name, oleg.b.antonyan@...il.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] pm: remove kernel thread freezing
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:07:13PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was not careful enough reading cover letter. Having series
> where 1-4/5 are ready to go, and 5/5 not-good-idea for years to come
> is quite confusing.
4/5 is not ready to go either, at the very least....
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists