| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <877ew8xu9x.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:47:38 +0100
From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: julien.thierry@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] kvm: arm64: handle single-step of userspace mmio instructions
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> writes:
> On 06/10/17 13:37, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 06/10/17 12:39, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> The system state of KVM when using userspace emulation is not complete
>>> until we return into KVM_RUN. To handle mmio related updates we wait
>>> until they have been committed and then schedule our KVM_EXIT_DEBUG.
>>>
>>> I've introduced a new function kvm_arm_maybe_return_debug() to wrap up
>>> the differences between arm/arm64 which is currently null for arm.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 9 +++------
>>> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
>>> virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 3 ++-
>>> 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 4a879f6ff13b..aec943f6d123 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>>> static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>>> static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>>> static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>>> +static inline int kvm_arm_maybe_return_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> + struct kvm_run *run) {}
>>>
>>> int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index e923b58606e2..fa67d21662f6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>>> void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> +int kvm_arm_maybe_return_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>> int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>>> int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>>> index dbadfaf850a7..a10a18c55c87 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
>>> @@ -221,3 +221,24 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * When KVM has successfully emulated the instruction we might want to
>>> + * return we a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this once the emulation
>>> + * is complete though so for userspace emulations we have to wait
>>> + * until we have re-entered KVM.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return > 0 to return to guest, 0 (and set exit_reason) on proper
>>> + * exit to userspace.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +int kvm_arm_maybe_return_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>> +{
>>> + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
>>> + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
>>> + run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> + return 1;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>>> index c918d291cb58..7b04f59217bf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>>> @@ -202,13 +202,10 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>> handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (handled && (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)) {
>>> - handled = 0;
>>> - run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
>>> - run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
>>> - }
>>> + if (handled)
>>> + return kvm_arm_maybe_return_debug(vcpu, run);
>>>
>>> - return handled;
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>>> index b9f68e4add71..3d28fe2daa26 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>>> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>>
>>> if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
>>> ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret < 1)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
>>> index b6e715fd3c90..e43e3bd6222f 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
>>> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>> vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - return 0;
>>> + /* If debugging in effect we may need to return now */
>>> + return kvm_arm_maybe_return_debug(vcpu, run);
>>
>> Ah, that's how you do it. OK. Then the patch splitting is wrong, because
>> everything is broken after patch #1.
>
> Actually, it is not broken at all. I'm just confused by the very
> esoteric flow.
We could just merge the whole patch in one but I wanted to show the
difference between in-kernel and out-of-kernel emulation.
I could also move the step handling to the mmio leg in
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run but you mentioned you use the mmio completion
elsewhere anyway?
--
Alex Bennée
Powered by blists - more mailing lists