[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ab302d3-a7d6-fc70-1857-aec556d3f55c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:21:23 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] KVM: LAPIC: Apply change to TDCR right away to the
timer
On 06/10/2017 16:01, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> + if (!apic->lapic_timer.period)
> + return;
> +
> + now = ktime_get();
> + remaining = ktime_sub(apic->lapic_timer.target_expiration, now);
> + if (ktime_to_ns(remaining) < 0)
> + remaining = 0;
> + delta = mod_64(ktime_to_ns(remaining), apic->lapic_timer.period);
I think this shouldn't be happening. If it does, I'm not sure the mod
is the right thing to do, so I'd just use ktime_to_ns(remaining).
So perhaps let's simplify all this to:
ns_remaining_old = ktime_to_ns(remaining);
ns_remaining_new = mul_u64_u32_div(ns_remaining_old,
apic->divide_count, old_divisor);
because below you're calling nsec_to_cycles but remaining is not expressed
in nanoseconds.
> + if (!delta)
> + return;
> +
> + delta = delta * apic->divide_count / old_divisor;
> +
> + limit_periodic_timer_frequency(apic);
This should be done before all the "if"s (which should not be there in v8,
but you should still call it before "now = ktime_get();").
Paolo
> + apic->lapic_timer.tscdeadline += nsec_to_cycles(apic->vcpu, delta) -
> + nsec_to_cycles(apic->vcpu, remaining);
> + apic->lapic_timer.target_expiration = ktime_add_ns(now, delta);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists