linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171006143259.rs3zh7k5tmsgesqy@treble>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:32:59 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives
 infrastructure

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:35:03PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> 
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > +/*
> > + * Paravirt alternatives are applied much earlier than normal alternatives.
> > + * They are only applied when running on a hypervisor.  They replace some
> > + * native instructions with calls to pv ops.
> > + */
> > +void __init apply_pv_alternatives(void)
> > +{
> > +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PV_OPS);
> 
> Not for Xen HVM guests.

>From what I can tell, HVM guests still use pv_time_ops and
pv_mmu_ops.exit_mmap, right?

> > +	apply_alternatives(__pv_alt_instructions, __pv_alt_instructions_end);
> > +}
> 
> 
> This is a problem (at least for Xen PV guests):
> apply_alternatives()->text_poke_early()->local_irq_save()->...'cli'->death.

Ah, right.

> It might be possible not to turn off/on the interrupts in this
> particular case since the guest probably won't be able to handle an
> interrupt at this point anyway.

Yeah, that should work.  For Xen and for the other hypervisors, this is
called well before irq init, so interrupts can't be handled yet anyway.

> > +
> >  void __init_or_module apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch_site *start,
> >  				     struct paravirt_patch_site *end)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
> > index 4fa90006ac68..17243fe0f5ce 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
> > @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ void __init init_hypervisor_platform(void)
> >  	if (!x86_hyper)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	apply_pv_alternatives();
> 
> Not for Xen PV guests who have already done this.

I think it would be harmless, but yeah, it's probably best to only write
it once.

Thanks for the review!

-- 
Josh