lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171006075700.587a5e22@xeon-e3>
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 07:57:00 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     "Stahl, Manuel" <manuel.stahl@...-extern.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "hjk@...utronix.de" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sojkam1@....cvut.cz" <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: Prefer MSI(X) interrupts in PCI drivers

On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:50:44 +0000
"Stahl, Manuel" <manuel.stahl@...-extern.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> MSI(X) interrupts are not shared between devices. So when available
> those should be preferred over legacy interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Stahl <manuel.stahl@....fraunhofer.de>
> ---
>  drivers/uio/uio_pci_dmem_genirq.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c     | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

The last time I tried to do MSI-X with pci-generic it got rejected
by the maintainer.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ