[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171006152355.73fljxsihnejppx4@treble>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:23:55 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/27] linkage: new macros for assembler symbols
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> SYM_CODE_INNER_LABEL -- only for labels in the middle of code
> SYM_CODE_INNER_LABEL_NOALIGN -- only for labels in the middle of code
Why are the inner labels aligned by default? Seems like unaligned would
be the most common case.
>
> d) For data
> SYM_DATA_START -- global data symbol
> SYM_DATA_END -- the end of the SYM_DATA_START symbol
> SYM_DATA_END_LABEL -- the labeled end of SYM_DATA_START symbol
> SYM_DATA_SIMPLE -- start+end wrapper around simple global data
> SYM_DATA_SIMPLE_LOCAL -- start+end wrapper around simple local data
"SIMPLE" seems superfluous, how about s/SYM_DATA_SIMPLE/SYM_DATA/ ?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists